State AG
Enforcement Tracker.
State attorney general actions, regulatory consent orders, and class enforcement against U.S. solar providers — organized by state. If your state's AG has taken action against your solar company, your case is stronger by default.
California AG.
California is the largest solar market and the most active enforcement jurisdiction. The CA AG has open actions against Sunrun's dealer network, GoodLeap, and several PACE administrators. California Civil Code §1689.5 (door-to-door rescission), §1632 (Spanish-language contracts), and §1770 (false advertising) are the primary statutes.
Targeting Sunrun's third-party dealer network for systematic violations of door-to-door rescission rights and elder financial abuse statutes.
Department of Real Estate enforcement against PACE program administrators for inadequate ability-to-repay analysis.
California enacted enhanced consumer-protection statutes for residential solar transactions in 2023-2024. Mandatory cooling-off periods and dealer-fee disclosures.
Texas AG.
Texas has been one of the most aggressive enforcement states against solar door-to-door abuses. The Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA) provides treble damages and is the primary statute used.
Texas Attorney General settlement covering door-to-door sales abuses, false advertising, and statutory cooling-off period violations across thousands of contracts.
Coordinated enforcement against regional installers in Houston and Dallas metros for false advertising and unlicensed contracting.
Securities class action filed in Texas against Houston-based Sunnova Energy.
Florida AG & Legislature.
Florida passed sweeping PACE reform legislation in 2023 (SB 770) after years of consumer-protection complaints. AG enforcement against door-to-door solar abuses is active, particularly in retiree-heavy counties.
Individual settlement after forensic confirmation of forged solar PPA signature. Set precedent for forensic-signature recovery cases in FL.
Statewide reform requiring ability-to-repay analysis, cooling-off periods, and prohibiting PACE marketing to seniors without family-member notification.
Arizona AG & Class Actions.
Arizona has growing solar consumer protection activity, particularly around Sunnova and door-to-door abuses in Maricopa and Pima counties.
Family awarded contract voidance + damages after dealer rep represented system would "eliminate" electric bill. Actual savings under 10% with 4.5% PPA escalator.
Ongoing AG investigations into Sunnova dealer network and regional Phoenix installers.
Connecticut AG.
Connecticut's AG was the first to reach a major settlement with GoodLeap covering 1,800+ affected homeowners.
Settlement requiring GoodLeap to refund excess fees to 1,800+ Connecticut homeowners and adopt new dealer-fee disclosure standards. Restitution checks issued via escrow agent.
Massachusetts AG.
Massachusetts AG settled with ADT Solar in 2024 and the Mass Solar Disclosure Rules went into effect in 2024-2025 — among the strongest in the nation.
Refunds + disclosure reform covering misrepresented federal solar tax credit values and improperly disclosed financing terms.
New York AG.
The New York AG filed an active action against Sunrun in July 2024 covering legacy Vivint Solar contracts that continue to inflict ongoing harm through escalator clauses and panel performance misrepresentations.
$35M+ sought covering legacy Vivint Solar contracts in New York.
New Jersey DCA & AG.
New Jersey has one of the most generous solar credit markets (SRECs / TRECs) — which has attracted both legitimate installers and aggressive dealer networks. NJ Division of Consumer Affairs has been actively enforcing Home Improvement Practices Regulations against solar contractors operating without proper licensure or with deceptive sales tactics.
Active enforcement against unlicensed solar contractors and dealer networks with documented sales-practice violations. NJSA 56:8 (Consumer Fraud Act) is the primary statute.
Ongoing investigation into multiple Sunrun and Sunnova dealer-network operators in Bergen, Monmouth, and Ocean counties.
Nevada AG.
Nevada has been a high-volume solar sales market — both Las Vegas and Reno metros have seen significant door-to-door solar activity. Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act (NRS 598) provides treble damages for solar fraud, and the Nevada Public Utilities Commission has rulemaking authority over NEM disputes.
Ongoing investigation into regional Las Vegas-area installers with documented door-to-door violations and unlicensed work allegations.
Colorado AG.
Colorado's solar market has grown rapidly with the state's clean-energy targets. The Colorado AG's Consumer Protection Division has issued multiple consumer alerts and is actively investigating door-to-door solar practices in Denver, Boulder, and Colorado Springs metros.
Multiple consumer alerts issued covering aggressive door-to-door solar sales, misrepresented utility-rate increases, and rebate-claim misrepresentations.
New Mexico AG.
New Mexico has aggressive consumer-protection statutes (NMSA §57-12 Unfair Practices Act) plus a Spanish-language contract statute paralleling California's §1632. Solar enforcement has been growing in Albuquerque and Las Cruces metros.
Active investigations under NM Unfair Practices Act covering Sunnova and GoodLeap dealer-network operations, including Spanish-language contract violations.
North Carolina AG.
North Carolina has been one of the South's most active solar enforcement states. NC DOJ Consumer Protection Division has issued consent orders against multiple solar installers and dealers under the NC Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act (G.S. 75-1.1).
Series of consent orders against regional installers covering misrepresented savings, unlicensed solar work, and door-to-door practice violations.
Georgia AG.
Georgia's Fair Business Practices Act (O.C.G.A. §10-1-390) is the primary solar consumer-protection statute. Georgia AG's Consumer Protection Division has been actively investigating Atlanta metro solar abuses.
Ongoing investigations into Atlanta-area Sunnova and ADT Solar dealer networks for FBPA violations including misrepresented savings and improper financing disclosures.
Virginia OAG.
Virginia has growing solar enforcement under the Virginia Consumer Protection Act (§59.1-198). The Office of the Attorney General Consumer Protection Section has been actively investigating Northern Virginia and Tidewater metro solar dealers.
Multiple consent decrees and settlements under VCPA covering misrepresented utility savings, undisclosed lien terms, and door-to-door rescission violations.
Maryland AG.
Maryland has some of the strongest consumer-protection statutes in the country (MD Consumer Protection Act, Door-to-Door Sales Act). MD AG has actively enforced against solar dealers across the Baltimore-Washington metro corridor.
Multiple enforcement actions against regional solar dealers covering Door-to-Door Sales Act violations and misrepresented financing disclosures.
Illinois AG & ICC.
Illinois has joint solar enforcement through the AG and Illinois Commerce Commission. The Illinois Consumer Fraud Act (815 ILCS 505) plus the Solar for All program have created an aggressive enforcement environment for misleading solar sales practices.
Coordinated enforcement against Chicagoland and downstate solar dealers under IL Consumer Fraud Act. Pattern of misrepresentation in Solar for All program eligibility.
Multiple consumer complaints regarding misrepresented post-NEM economics filed with ICC.
Ohio AG.
Ohio AG's Consumer Protection Section enforces under the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (R.C. §1345). Solar-related complaints in Ohio increased 240% from 2022 to 2024, with active investigations in Columbus, Cleveland, and Cincinnati metros.
Multiple consent judgments against regional installers under Ohio CSPA covering aggressive door-to-door tactics and misrepresented system performance.
Pennsylvania OAG.
Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (UTPCPL, 73 P.S. §201) is the primary statute. OAG Bureau of Consumer Protection has been investigating Philadelphia and Pittsburgh metro solar abuses with growing frequency since 2023.
Multiple settlements with regional solar installers covering UTPCPL violations including misrepresented financing structures and undisclosed lien filings.
Michigan AG.
Michigan AG's Consumer Protection Division enforces under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (MCL §445.901). Detroit metro and West Michigan have been the primary investigation regions, with documented cases involving misrepresented utility savings and improper PACE marketing.
Settlements and investigations covering misrepresented savings claims and improper financing disclosures by regional Michigan installers.
Oregon DOJ.
Oregon DOJ enforces under Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act (ORS §646.605). Oregon has growing solar enforcement focused on Portland metro misrepresentation cases and PACE-program disputes.
Ongoing UTPA enforcement against multiple Portland-metro installers covering misrepresented PPA economics and improper financing terms.
Washington AG.
Washington's Consumer Protection Act (RCW 19.86) is one of the strongest consumer-protection statutes in the country, allowing treble damages plus attorney's fees. WA AG has been investigating Seattle and Spokane metro solar dealer networks since 2024.
Active CPA investigations against regional installers covering misrepresented utility-rate increases and improper lien filings.
Utah DCP.
Utah's Division of Consumer Protection enforces under Utah Code §13-11 (Consumer Sales Practices Act). Utah has been a primary market for Vivint Solar (originally headquartered there) and continues to see enforcement against Lehi-area installers post-Vivint/Sunrun acquisition.
Multiple cases against Utah-based solar installers and dealers covering CSPA violations, including legacy Vivint Solar dealer-network operations.
Hawaii OCP.
Hawaii has the highest residential solar penetration of any U.S. state — and correspondingly heavy enforcement under Hawaii Revised Statutes §480. OCP has been actively investigating Honolulu solar installers and the post-NEM-3 transition disputes.
Active enforcement covering misrepresented tariff economics post-NEM-3 transition, plus standard misrepresented savings cases.
Missouri AG.
Missouri is one of three states (with CA and FL) targeted in the March 2025 multi-state PACE class action. Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (RSMo §407) is the primary statute. MO AG has been investigating PACE program abuses since 2023.
Ongoing investigation into PACE administrators operating in Missouri. MO is among the named states in the March 2025 multi-state PACE class action.
Minnesota AG.
Minnesota's Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act (MS §325F) is the primary statute. MN AG has been investigating regional installers, particularly cases involving misrepresented system production estimates that didn't account for Minnesota's heavy snow load.
Investigations covering inflated production estimates that didn't account for snow load reduction, plus standard misrepresentation cases.
Your state is still covered.
VOID MY SOLAR works with homeowners in all 50 states. Even if your state isn't profiled above with active AG enforcement, the federal Truth in Lending Act, federal door-to-door rescission rights, CFPB enforcement reach, and FTC consumer-protection statutes apply nationwide. State enforcement is one pathway; federal law is another.
Federal TILA applies to all U.S. consumer credit transactions including solar loans. Disclosure violations are actionable in any state.
Federal 3-day rescission right applies to door-to-door sales of $25+ in any state. Solar contracts signed at the home almost always qualify.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has nationwide jurisdiction over solar lenders. The Mosaic consent order and ongoing GoodLeap activity apply to borrowers in all states.
Your state in enforcement?
If your state's AG has settled with or is pursuing your solar provider, your individual claim has a substantially stronger evidentiary base — and may already be eligible for inclusion in restitution. Run the Pre-Check to see how your state and company combination scores.